5th January 2025 – (Hong Kong) With a yawning budget deficit projected to reach nearly HK$100 billion this financial year, Hong Kong is facing an impending fiscal reckoning. Financial Secretary Paul Chan has pledged to curb recurring expenses and prioritise productive public works like the Northern Metropolis development. However, tackling such an immense shortfall requires a multi-pronged approach that balances prudent cost-cutting with protecting the interests of ordinary citizens.
The reality is that Hong Kong’s expenditures have spiralled while revenues have stagnated. Pandemic-related spending, high interest rates, and geopolitical headwinds have taken a toll on the city’s coffers. The government can ill afford to kick the can down the road – sustained deficits of this magnitude jeopardise Hong Kong’s prized fiscal reserves and economic stability.
To his credit, Chan recognises the need for deep spending cuts and revenue enhancements. However, some of the proposed solutions have stoked controversy and merit scrutiny. The suggestion of civil service salary reductions, while pragmatic from a bean-counting perspective, could dampen consumption and business confidence if not carefully implemented.
There are over 170,000 civil servants in Hong Kong, and their remuneration constitutes a significant portion of annual expenditure. A blanket 10% cut to their pay, as some academics have proposed, could theoretically save HK$15 billion annually. However, such a drastic move risks demoralising this vital workforce and precipitating an exodus of talent to the private sector at a time when the government needs outstanding professionals to steer Hong Kong through turbulent economic waters.
A more nuanced approach would be scaling back future salary increases rather than slashing current pay rates. The government should also critically examine its voluminous roster of civil service positions. There may be bloat and redundancies that can be pared through natural attrition rather than layoffs that damage morale.
Similarly, while the idea of pay cuts for top officials and lawmakers has symbolic value, the actual budgetary savings would be relatively paltry. The salaries of ministers, the Chief Executive, and Legislative Council members collectively amount to a fraction of overall spending. A better solution may be instituting a wage freeze at senior levels until the fiscal balance is restored.
Where more drastic cuts could reap major savings is curtailing Hong Kong’s considerable expenditure on welfare programs that strain a limited population’s ability to fund them. The HK$2 elderly fare concession costs billions annually and will only increase as the population ages. While cherished, means-testing or adjusting the eligibility age could mitigate this fiscal drain while still supporting those most in need.
Another multi-billion dollar drain is the costs of supporting refugees and asylum seekers – an expense that some deem an unfair colonial-era legacy. Hong Kong should urgently negotiate an exit from the UN treaty obligations that mandate this spending. With Beijing’s backing, it could reset this policy in a manner more sustainable for an advanced economy.
On the revenue side, the dismal land sale returns must be addressed. Resuming the Application List system for land sales has been mooted, though Chan rightly opposes ceding control of supply to ensure housing affordability. The government should instead explore securitising its vast land holdings and allowing appropriately zoned parcels to be tendered continually at market-clearing prices.
Hong Kong will be well-served neither by austerity that damages core functions and capabilities nor by putting the entire fiscal adjustment onus on the populace. However, modest sacrifices from all quarters – public and private – are required to eliminate the deficit over a realistic multi-year timeframe.
Tax rates should be reviewed to raise revenues progressively without stifling enterprise. Unnecessary subsidies and transfer payments should be pared. Unproductive expenditures like the HK$31 billion Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link investment can be avoided going forward.
Most critically, an overhaul of Hong Kong’s expenditure structure is needed to prioritise the investments that drive economic vibrancy and quality of life. Developing new industries, boosting re-skilling efforts, upgrading infrastructure, and enhancing regional integration should take precedence over enlarging the inflexible recurrent cost base.
Hong Kong boasts governance assets like a capable civil service, respect for the rule of law, and ease of doing business. However, the current fiscal trajectory risks eroding these foundations if not addressed. By coupling pragmatic belt-tightening with an unwavering focus on productive growth catalysts, Hong Kong can reduce the deficit responsibly and uphold its status as a world-class metropolitan crucible of enterprise and opportunity.
The post Hong Kong faces fiscal stalemate and must cut costs responsibly appeared first on Dimsum Daily.
English (US) ·